How to Vote on a Proposal
Voting allows you to evaluate proposals and help decide how AROGYA incentives are distributed.
Step 1: Navigate to Voting Page
Go to:
Dashboard → Vote on Proposal
This is where you can submit your vote.
Step 2: What You Need Before Voting
To vote, you must have:
- A Proposal ID (the proposal you want to vote on)
- A Conviction ID (your locked stake used for voting)
- An active conviction (not expired)
- The proposal must still be within its active voting period
You cannot vote once the voting window has closed.
Step 3: Submit Your Vote
When voting, you will:
- Enter the Proposal ID
- Select your Conviction ID
- Choose a score between 0–10
- Submit your vote
Your voting power depends on your conviction level (lock duration).
Step 4: Voting Rules
- You can vote only once per proposal using a conviction.
- You cannot use the same conviction to vote twice on the same proposal.
- Higher conviction = stronger voting weight.
Step 5: Vote Fairly and Responsibly
Always evaluate proposals carefully before voting.
Consider whether:
- The work is genuine and clearly documented
- The contribution benefits the ecosystem
- The effort matches the requested incentives
- Evidence and progress are verifiable
Step 6: Types of Contributions to Evaluate
Proposals may fall into different categories, such as:
- Research & Academia — scientific studies, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, data analysis, technical papers, and research replication
- Education & Knowledge Sharing — tutorials, educational guides, courses, workshops, explainers, and evidence-based health information
- Health & Wellness Innovation — development of new tools, technologies, protocols, interventions, or approaches that could improve health and wellbeing
- Public Health — disease prevention, health promotion, community health initiatives, screening programs, and population-level interventions
- Mental Health & Wellbeing — research, education, interventions, peer support, and resources related to psychological wellbeing and mental health
- Nutrition & Lifestyle — evidence-based work on nutrition, physical activity, sleep, stress management, healthy lifestyles, and preventive health
- Traditional & Complementary Health — rigorous research and documentation of traditional, complementary, and alternative health practices, particularly where evidence and safety can be evaluated
- Community Health & Outreach — initiatives that improve access to health information, resources, services, or support within communities
- Open Science & Data — open datasets, research infrastructure, reproducible research, open-source tools, and resources that enable further health research
- Peer Review & Scientific Criticism — reviewing research, identifying methodological problems, reproducing findings, and improving the quality of published work
- Health Communication — translating scientific evidence into accessible content for researchers, practitioners, patients, and the general public
- Collaboration & Research Networks — projects that connect researchers, practitioners, educators, and communities to conduct or support health and wellness research
- Policy & Evidence-Based Advocacy — research and analysis that can inform health policies, public programs, and institutional decision-making
- Practical Community Impact — measurable initiatives that apply existing evidence to improve health outcomes or wellbeing in real-world communities
Each category may require different evaluation standards.
Remember that if the conviction-weighted mean score is between +1 and +5, the proposal will receive incentives.
Important Tips
- Vote honestly and based on quality.
- Avoid bias or personal influence.
- Responsible voting strengthens the ecosystem.